Immosearch Immosearch
Sign up

Cancel
KI-Symbolbild: Ein älteres Haus mit verwittertem Dach am Rand eines Feldes, gegenüber ein Bauernhof vor bewaldeten Hängen unter Wolken.
Practical article Plots & building Austria

When the leasehold ends: Do not derive the agreed compensation from the purchase price

Understand the Austrian leasehold (Baurecht) end compensation as a contractual and valuation question, instead of deriving an amount from today’s purchase price.

Automatically translated – the German version is legally binding. Show original (German)

Published
19 Oct 2026
Research as of
17 Oct 2026
Applies to
Austria
For whom
Owners & landlords
Article ID
WX26-07-AT-009

You are interested in a building on leasehold land (Baurechtsgrund). Besides the current price and the ongoing building ground rent (Bauzins) you should understand another question: what has been agreed for the end of the leasehold (Baurecht)? Any possible later compensation cannot simply be derived from today’s purchase price.

The statutory rule is a fallback rule

§ 9 BauRG provides in Austria that the structure passes to the landowner when the leasehold expires. Paragraph 2, in the absence of another agreement, provides for compensation amounting to one quarter of the existing building value (Bauwert). [BAURECHT] The limitation “in the absence of another agreement” is particularly important for preparation. The specific contractual arrangement must be read before you rely on a statutory default assumption.

This article does not equate the statutory term Bauwert with purchase price, market value or a self‑estimated reconstruction cost. How a concrete claim is to be assessed and, where applicable, valued must be determined by an expert on a case‑by‑case basis.

Treat the end‑arrangement as a separate point for review

Request the relevant leasehold documents and amendments. State in the consultation explicitly that you want to understand not only the remaining term but also the consequences of expiry. Which contractual provision is applicable, which open valuation questions exist and which further rights or encumbrances must be considered?

Also note your economic assumption. If your personal financial plan assumes a certain residual value, it must be clear whether that amount is documented, professionally valued or so far only hoped for. A personal spreadsheet value does not become secure simply because it lies far in the future.

An example with the wrong reference value

In the fictitious sales discussion it is said that at the end you will “in any case get a share of the purchase price back”. The interested party does not allow a private repayment calculation to be made on that basis. She submits the contract and the statement for legal advice and asks about the actual compensation framework.

There it is possible to discuss separately any agreed provisions, the statutory starting point and the need for valuation. The interested party then records which assumption is sustainable for her decision and which amount cannot currently be treated as promised.

Think together with remaining term and financing

The end‑arrangement is part of the overall acquisition decision. Clarify with the responsible specialists how term, possible further agreements and financing fit together. This article does not promise any extension, any particular compensation or any general financeability.

The useful work result is an understandable explanation of the specific end‑arrangement with its open valuation questions. It complements the consideration of ongoing costs with an important point about the future, without turning the statutory fallback rule into a blanket yield or repayment promise.

Sources and context

Created with the help of AI and editorially reviewed. General guidance only; not individual legal, tax or financial advice. Errors and later changes are possible.