The editorial team selected a suitable sequence of its own property photos. After the transfer, however, a different image appears first. The file names already begin with numbers. Before the team tries further names, the actual mapping of image, asset identifier and target order must be clarified.
The fictional case concerns a German provider with responsible technical support. The article uses the documented ImmoScout 24 API as a limited example. It does not execute a request and does not claim identical functionality for other portals.
Record the released sequence by the correct media
Our recommendation is a short target sequence with an unambiguous property reference and actual image references. Which specific file should be first, which next? A name like wohnzimmer.jpg is not sufficient when different units have similarly named files.
In the fictional case two flats have identical overview names. The team therefore links file contents, origin and existing identifiers to the correct unit. A technical check reference can support the assignment, but it does not confirm capture time or usage rights. Unresolved media remain outside any purportedly secure order.
Clarify the actually documented asset order
The ImmoScout 24 documentation contains a separate retrieval of the asset sequence. It also describes a comparison between one’s own asset identifiers and the portal’s recipient identifiers. [Q1] Numbered file names are therefore not by themselves complete evidence of the target sorting for this documented ordering procedure.
The responsible technical support checks the method used and the functions it actually supports. The editorial team provides the intended meaning and target sequence. It does not independently attempt live transfers with presumed identifiers.
Explicitly consider the title image and additional assets
For the described modification method the documentation explains that the first image identifier becomes the title image. It also contains special notes on image and PDF assets. [Q2] No blanket sequence for all document areas and portal presentations is derived from this here.
The team therefore clarifies which visible presentation is actually to be changed. An image in the document area is not by its position already the same task as the first photo in the gallery. The answer is related to the actual transfer and presentation context.
Verify the correction on the public sequence
After a separately authorised implementation the editorial team compares the actually visible motifs with the confirmed target sequence. It does not merely count files. In the example the correct flat overview must appear first; an accidentally similar view would not be a passed result.
A manual intermediate correction reaches its limit when later transfers could change it again. The leading source and further maintenance are therefore coordinated professionally. The conclusion confirms the specifically checked sequence on the correct property and does not provide a general sorting guarantee through a new file name.